Info Gov

The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) has been found in breach of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 after failing to provide a timely response to a request concerning a meeting between its Political Director and a former senior Israeli military official.

In a decision notice issued on 9 January 2026, the Information Commissioner concluded that the department had unlawfully exceeded the time allowed to consider the public interest test, contrary to **section 17(3) FOIA**.

The complainant sought detailed information about a meeting in 17 February 2025 between Dr Christian Turner, the FCDO’s Political Director, and Major General Tal Kalman, former Chief of Staff of the Israeli Air Force. The request, submitted on 13 August 2025, asked for:

- Confirmation of the meeting’s location
- Names and affiliations of attendees
- Minutes, notes, briefings, or summaries
- Related internal communications
- Any instructions on record‑keeping
- Any public‑facing statements or materials

On 11 September 2025, the FCDO informed the requester that it was extending the deadline to consider the public interest test.

ICO findings

While FOIA allows public authorities to extend the deadline when applying qualified exemptions, the Commissioner stressed that such extensions must be “reasonable”. The section 45 Code of Practice states that, in most cases, this should not exceed an additional 20 working days, meaning a total of 40 working days to respond.

The ICO found no “exceptional circumstances” justifying a longer delay and ruled that the FCDO had breached section 17(3) by failing to issue a substantive response within a reasonable timeframe.

The Commissioner ordered the FCDO to:

- Provide a full substantive response** to the FOI request
- Do so within 30 calendar days of the decision notice

Failure to comply may result in the Commissioner certifying the matter to the High Court, where it may be treated as **contempt of court**.

Both the complainant and the FCDO may appeal to the First‑tier Tribunal (Information Rights) within 28 days of the decision notice.

Also in this section

Jul 29, 2026

Enforcement notice served on university after FOI compliance falls to 21% in a quarter

The Information Commissioner has issued an enforcement notice under section 52 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 against King's College London (KCL), requiring the university to publish an action plan by 17 August 2026, clear its backlog of overdue requests, and achieve a 90% in-time compliance rate by the end of the year, after finding systemic weaknesses in its request-handling…
Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800