Info Gov

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has published new guidance to support public authorities dealing with a rise in AI-generated Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and increasingly complex cases.

The ICO said the guidance is in response to public authorities that say they are also seeing requests that misquote legislation or require significant clarification before they can be processed.

According to the document, the trend has seen FOI requests that are “very long, repetitive and contain unrelated comments or misdirected demands”, while having a greater scope.

It also noted that the requests are sometimes written in a way which makes it harder to identify the information being requested.

To help tackle this, the document includes guidance on requests that are generated using AI that misinterpret or misquote FOI legislation; managing higher volumes of requests that require clarification or refinement; and maintaining fair and consistent handling of requests, regardless of how they are created.

It also includes examples of practical wording public authorities can use to encourage responsible use of AI by requesters and support clearer, more effective FOI requests.

Deborah Clark, Upstream Regulation Manager at the Information Commissioner’s Office, said that FOI practitioners have told the ICO that AI-generated requests are "changing the day-to-day reality of their work".

She added: "This guidance is about giving teams practical, sensible support, not adding new burdens. It does not change the law or create new requirements, instead it helps teams apply existing FOI principles consistently, regardless of how a request is created.

"Used responsibly, AI also has the potential to help public authorities improve how they handle FOI requests, and this guidance sits alongside our wider work to support innovation that delivers real benefits for organisations and the public."

Clark said the ICO's aim is to support and maintain effective access to information for everyone, while making sure FOI services remain workable and resilient as technology continues to evolve.

Also in this section

Sep 11, 2026

Tribunal backs NPCC cost-limit refusal of request on Chinese-made police surveillance cameras

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against the National Police Chiefs' Council's refusal to confirm whether it holds information on the proportion of Chinese-manufactured surveillance cameras used by UK police forces, finding that the cost of establishing whether the information existed would exceed the appropriate limit under section 12(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Sep 01, 2026

Upper Tribunal breaks with Moss and recognises article 10 right to receive information in FOIA appeals

The Upper Tribunal has held that First-tier and Upper Tribunals are not bound by precedent to automatically reject the limited right to receive information under article 10 (“Freedom of Expression”) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) recognised by the Grand Chamber in Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v Hungary departing from the 2020 decision in Moss v Information Commissioner ( that had…
Aug 27, 2026

DfE "acting in concert" argument on repeated requests rejected as campaigner's appeals fail

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed three appeals brought by campaigner Dr Robert Abrahart against the Department for Education, upholding two findings that his requests were vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and confirming in the third that emails withheld under sections 35 and 42 were exempt, while rejecting the department's attempt to treat requests from…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800