Info Gov

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has published new guidance to support public authorities dealing with a rise in AI-generated Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and increasingly complex cases.

The ICO said the guidance is in response to public authorities that say they are also seeing requests that misquote legislation or require significant clarification before they can be processed.

According to the document, the trend has seen FOI requests that are “very long, repetitive and contain unrelated comments or misdirected demands”, while having a greater scope.

It also noted that the requests are sometimes written in a way which makes it harder to identify the information being requested.

To help tackle this, the document includes guidance on requests that are generated using AI that misinterpret or misquote FOI legislation; managing higher volumes of requests that require clarification or refinement; and maintaining fair and consistent handling of requests, regardless of how they are created.

It also includes examples of practical wording public authorities can use to encourage responsible use of AI by requesters and support clearer, more effective FOI requests.

Deborah Clark, Upstream Regulation Manager at the Information Commissioner’s Office, said that FOI practitioners have told the ICO that AI-generated requests are "changing the day-to-day reality of their work".

She added: "This guidance is about giving teams practical, sensible support, not adding new burdens. It does not change the law or create new requirements, instead it helps teams apply existing FOI principles consistently, regardless of how a request is created.

"Used responsibly, AI also has the potential to help public authorities improve how they handle FOI requests, and this guidance sits alongside our wider work to support innovation that delivers real benefits for organisations and the public."

Clark said the ICO's aim is to support and maintain effective access to information for everyone, while making sure FOI services remain workable and resilient as technology continues to evolve.

Also in this section

Jun 02, 2026

Tribunal upholds NCND response over planning enforcement correspondence despite arson attack backdrop

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an Environmental Information Regulations appeal brought by a resident seeking to establish whether Lambeth Council had written to the owner of a neighbouring property in the weeks before an arson attack on his home, finding that the privacy rights of the property owner outweighed the appellant's legitimate interests in disclosure.
Jun 02, 2026

University first to be fined for contempt of court in FOI request dispute

The University of Exeter has been fined £15,000 after the Upper Tribunal concluded that a 14-month failure to comply with a disclosure order in a freedom of information case amounted to contempt of court, believed to be the first time a public authority has been fined for contempt of court in a Freedom of Information (FOI) case.
May 15, 2026

Getting the timing right

The date for assessing whether a request is vexatious or manifestly unreasonable, in the context of freedom of information and environmental information refusal decisions, is an issue with a surprisingly long tail - particularly given its practical importance to public bodies when faced with information rights requests.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800