Info Gov

The Housing Ombudsman has launched a public consultation on how it will handle complaints under the new Social Tenant Access to Information Requirements (STAIRs), a reform giving millions of tenants of Private Registered Providers (PRPs) - mainly housing associations - stronger rights to request information about how their homes are managed.


The Housing Ombudsman Service has begun seeking views on its proposed approach to investigating complaints made under STAIRs, a new legal framework that grants tenants of ** the right to access information about the management of their homes.

Local authority tenants are not covered by the new requirements as councils already fall under the Freedom of Information Act.

The consultation (https://www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk/app/uploads/2026/01/Social-Tenant-Access-to-Information-Requirements-STAIRs-consultation.pdf), published on 20 January 2026, invites responses from PRPs, tenants, and anyone with an interest in social housing across England. It runs until 17 March 2026.

The government confirmed in September 2025 that the Housing Ombudsman would act as the official complaints body for STAIRs. The Ombudsman has since updated its Scheme to reflect this new responsibility.

Under STAIRs:
- Tenants can request information about decisions and activities affecting their homes, communities, or landlords.
- PRPs must meet new transparency obligations.
- The Ombudsman will investigate complaints where tenants believe information has been wrongly withheld.

The Ombudsman is asking for feedback on:
- Who is eligible to complain under STAIRs
- Whether the proposed time limits for complaints are fair
- Whether the planned investigation approach will deliver fair and consistent outcomes

“An opportunity to rebuild trust”
Housing Ombudsman Richard Blakeway said the reforms could help rebuild confidence between tenants and landlords at a time when trust is low.

“Trust and transparency are vital for a positive landlord‑tenant relationship… At a time when trust is low, this is an opportunity for PRPs to turn this tide.”

He encouraged tenants and landlords to take part, saying their feedback would help shape a fair and effective system.

Also in this section

Jul 29, 2026

Enforcement notice served on university after FOI compliance falls to 21% in a quarter

The Information Commissioner has issued an enforcement notice under section 52 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 against King's College London (KCL), requiring the university to publish an action plan by 17 August 2026, clear its backlog of overdue requests, and achieve a 90% in-time compliance rate by the end of the year, after finding systemic weaknesses in its request-handling…
Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800