Info Gov

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust has referred itself to the Information Commissioner's Office after up to 40 members of staff accessed the medical records of a three-year-old boy treated at Addenbrooke's Hospital following a crocodile attack.

The boy, from Cambridgeshire, was seriously injured while in the crocodile enclosure at Johnsons of Old Hurst near Huntingdon on 18 June, with police called to the scene at 13:34 BST after he was pulled out by zoo staff; a 30-year-old man from Norfolk was subsequently arrested on suspicion of attempted murder and later bailed. The boy was taken to Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge and, having initially sustained serious injuries, was confirmed by police on Monday to be "no longer critical" and in a stable condition.

A CUH spokesperson told InfoGov: "We have strict policies in place to safeguard patient data and we take any breach extremely seriously," adding that "we know the vast majority of our 13,000 staff understand the fundamental importance of maintaining patient confidentiality and uphold the highest professional standards."

The Trust said it is exploring whether there were legitimate reasons for the records to be accessed, with the spokesperson confirming that "where any member of staff is found to have accessed patient records without legitimate clinical or operational reasons we take robust disciplinary action, including dismissal," and that "as part of our response to any breach, we notify both the ICO and apologise to patients and their families affected."

The Trust operates an established process for restricting patient records where there is significant public interest, requiring anyone accessing a flagged file to input a valid care reason, and confirmed this restriction had been applied to the boy's record; it did not, however, prevent the reported access by around 40 individuals, and CUH has said there may have been valid reasons for some of this access but that the matter needs to be investigated. The Trust has notified both the ICO and the patient's family as part of the Duty of Candour process.

Under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, accessing patient records without a legitimate clinical or operational purpose constitutes unlawful processing of special category health data, and unauthorised access can itself amount to a criminal offence under section 170 of the DPA 2018 regardless of whether the data is further disclosed.

The case emerged just days after the ICO warned health trusts to take proactive steps to prevent breaches before they occurthe ICO warned health trusts to take proactive steps to prevent breaches before they occur, rather than manage the consequences after the fact. In May, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust dismissed 11 staff members for inappropriately accessing the medical records of the Nottingham attack victims.

Also in this section

Oct 19, 2026

ICO audit finds "limited" assurance over Derbyshire Constabulary data protection governance

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has given Derbyshire Constabulary a "limited" assurance rating for governance and accountability following a consensual data protection audit, finding that the force does not hold a comprehensive record of processing activities and is not yet meeting the logging requirements for law enforcement processing under section 62 of the Data Protection Act 2018.
Oct 19, 2026

DSG to pay £200,000 as consent order ends long-running cyber attack penalty dispute with ICO

The Information Commission (ICO) has confirmed that its long-running enforcement action against DSG Retail Ltd over the 2017 malware attack on Currys PC World and Dixons Travel tills has ended, after the First-tier Tribunal approved a consent order under which the retailer will pay £200,000 of the monetary penalty imposed by the tribunal rather than contest a fresh hearing.
Oct 14, 2026

ICO reprimands Met Police over unlawful data sharing

The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has been reprimanded by the Information Commission’s Office (ICO) after officers and staff unlawfully shared personal information through an unapproved third-party platform used to identify suspected shoplifters.